California

  Federal Attorneys.
HOME ABOUT US FAQ'S RESOURCES CONTACT US FREE CASE REVIEW
May 14, 2012
Federal-Lawyer
             
 
Selecting an attorney for legal cases is a very important decision. Please enter your information below to receive a Free Consultation from an attorney in your area:
 
Zip Code:   
 

Federal Law News

 

Debt Collectors Agree To Settle With FTC

A debt collection agency that allegedly used lies and threats to collect debts has agreed to settle Federal Trade Commission charges that its tactics violated federal laws.Under the court settlement, the company agreed to a $150,000 judgment and to refrain from illegal practices when collecting debts, including “time-barred” debts – debts so old they are no longer legally enforceable.

The government’s complaint alleges that Whitewing Financial Group, Inc. bought and attempted to collect on very old debts, many of which were beyond statutory limitations and too old to appear on credit reports, and many of which had been discharged in bankruptcy. As required by law, Whitewing sent “validation notices” informing consumers of their right to dispute the alleged debts, but its statements in phone calls allegedly often contradicted those notices. The statements pressured consumers to make payments before they had received the validation notice, and confused them about their rights, including who had the burden of establishing the validity of the debt.Under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA), if a consumer disputes all or part of a debt in writing within 30 days of receiving a validation notice, the debt collector must cease collection efforts until it has provided the consumer with written verification of the debt.

The complaint alleges that, because there is no legitimate method to enforce payment of time-barred debts, the defendants often misrepresented the status of the debts, leading people to believe that legal proceedings had begun, that lawsuits to collect debts were not time-barred, or that the defendants had documents showing that the debts were valid when, in fact, they did not.The complaint also alleges that the defendants misrepresented that if the consumer did not pay the debt, the defendants would take actions that they never intended to take, such as reporting the debts to credit bureaus or initiating legal proceedings. Read more at: www.ftc.gov

Contact our California Federal Lawyer Now!

 

 
Did You Know?    
 
 
 


  Newsroom  
 


Latest news about Federal Law cases in California and nationwide:

Eleven Defendants Indicted on Domestic Terrorism Charges
WASHINGTON, D.C. – Eleven defendants have been indicted on charges including arson and destruction of an energy facility for allegedly participatin...
Read more >


President Bush On The Middle East
Let me start by telling you I'm monitoring the situation in the Middle East very closely. Secretary Rice was in the region over the weekend and she...
Read more >


When They Were First Adopted For The Federal Courts
Authorization for practicing case management actually existed in the U.S. Federal Rules of Civil Procedure when they were first adopted for the fed...
Read more >


More Federal Law News >

 
 

Federal Law Terms

 


Today's Terms

Preponderance of the evidence

Definition:
Greater weight of evidence, or evidence that is more credible and convincing. Refers to the amount of proof necessary to win in a civil case.

Prospective

Definition:
Likely to come about, relating to or effective in the future.

Prosecutions

Definition:
Criminal legal proceedings.

More Federal Law Terms >

 

Federal Law Resources

 


Search Federal Law resources in our resource center:

More Resources >

 

Federal Law Hot Topics

 


Topics Related to Federal Law:

  • Accounting Fraud Crimes
  • Antitrust Crimes
  • Bankruptcy Fraud
  • Computer Crimes
  • Corporate Fraud
  • Drug Crimes
  • Environmental Crimes
  • Mail Fraud
  • Public Corruption
  • Rico Crimes
  • Securities Fraud
  • Tax Crimes
  • Terrorism

More Federal Law Topics >

California Federal Attorney

 
If you live in the following cities and need an federal attorney you should contact our Federal Attorney as soon as possible:

  • Antioch
  • Bell
  • Hawthorne
  • Long Beach
  • Los Angeles
  • Norwalk
  • Oceanside
  • Pacoima
  • Santa Ana
  • South Gate
  • Norwalk
  • Oceanside
  • Oxnard
  • Pacoima
  • Pittsburg
  • Santa Ana
  • South Gate
  • Sylmar
  • Watsonville
  • Westminster
  • Fremont
  • Fresno
  • Hawthorne
  • Hayward
  • Hesperia
  • Huntington Beach
  • Huntington Park
  • Indio
  • La Habra
  • La Puente
  • Laguna Niguel
  • Lake Forest
  • Lancaster
  • Livermore
  • Long Beach
  • Los Angeles
  • Lynwood
  • Merced
  • Milpitas
  • Montebello
  • Moreno Valley
  • Napa
  • North Hollywood
  • Norwalk
  • Oceanside
  • Ontario
  • Oxnard
  • Pacoima
  • Palmdale
  • Panorama City
  • Pico Rivera
  • Pittsburg
  • Pomona
  • Porterville
  • Reseda
  • Rialto
  • Riverside
  • Rosemead
  • Sacramento
  • Salinas
  • San Diego
  • San Francisco
  • San Jose
  • San Pedro
  • Santa Ana
  • Simi Valley
  • South Gate
  • South San Francisco
  • Sylmar
  • Tulare
  • Union City
  • Vacaville
  • Victorville
  • Vista
  • Watsonville
  • Westminster
 


Legal Disclaimers
All attorney listings are a paid attorney advertisement, and do not in any way constitute a referral or endorsement by an approved or authorized lawyer referral service. The information provided on California Federal Attorneys.com is not intended to be legal advice, but merely conveys general information related to legal issues commonly encountered. Your access to and use of this website is subject to additional Terms and Conditions.

Local Professional? Generate new business today
Call 866-227-9356 or contact a sales rep


This site is part of the LawFirms.com Network
©2012 ExpertHub, wholly owned subsidiary of MoxyMedia, Inc.